We have all heard of at least one controversial book that parents or educators disliked so it became banned. When I was in seventh grade this one book was banned because it was too direct about female puberty. The book was about this thirteen year old girl that was going through what every girl goes through and at one point needed to buy her first bra and she talked about having crushes on boys and all those weird things girls like in middle school. This one mom believed that the book was too graphic for her son. First off, why would her son read about a girl going through puberty? Secondly, everything mentioned in the book and more her son would learn when the nurses would come every year to teach us our yearly sex education class. So this is about a book and other books have gone through the same scrutiny but did you ever think “loaded” words other than curse words or derogatory terms would be banned from an educational system?
Well, the city of New York has developed a very long and interesting list of words they believe should be banned from the city’s standardized test. They have decided to create a list because they believe some words may evoke feelings that my upset certain students from certain backgrounds, demographics, or religious beliefs. The city of New York does defend its odd actions by saying that they are not the first to do this. They state that California avoids using the word “weed” in their test (like any state would talk about weed in a standardized test) and Florida avoids using the words “hurricanes” and “wildfires.” The only difference between these two states and New York is that New York has created a list with 50 words including words such as religion, politics, and dinosaurs! When asked by reporters why dinosaurs were being banned they casually replied that dinosaurs brings to mind evolution and may upset fundamentalist. Even though I thought standardized test could not get any worse, New York City students are going to have extremely boring standardized test.
Here are some of the words being banned:
· Abuse (physical, sexual, emotional, or psychological)
· Alcohol (beer and liquor), tobacco, or drugs
· Birthday celebrations (and birthdays)
· Bodily functions
· Cancer (and other diseases)
· Catastrophes/disasters (tsunamis and hurricanes)
· Celebrities
· Children dealing with serious issues
· Cigarettes (and other smoking paraphernalia)
· Computers in the home (acceptable in a school or library setting)
· Crime
· Death and disease
· Divorce
· Evolution (Dinosaurs)
· Expensive gifts, vacations, and prizes
· Gambling involving money
· Halloween
· Homelessness
· Homes with swimming pools
· Hunting
· Junk food
· In-depth discussions of sports that require prior knowledge
· Loss of employment
· Nuclear weapons
· Occult topics (i.e. fortune-telling)
· Parapsychology
· Politics
· Pornography
· Poverty
· Rap Music
· Religion
· Religious holidays and festivals (including but not limited to Christmas, Yom Kippur, and Ramadan)
· Rock-and-Roll music
· Running away
· Sex
· Slavery
· Terrorism
· Television and video games (excessive use)
· Traumatic material (including material that may be particularly upsetting such as animal shelters)
· Vermin (rats and roaches)
· Violence
· War and bloodshed
· Weapons (guns, knives, etc.)
· Witchcraft, sorcery, etc.
Do you think that the city of New York has a valid point in banning these words? Could keeping these words possibly cause some type of obstruction to the test taking skills of students? Comment away.
I think that most people use many of these words on a daily basis. Taking so many of them off the standardized test makes it very difficult for a student to relate to the material. There is also the 1st amendment to consider. Controlling what words to avoid in a Standardized Test is not very constitutional. Censoring these words will only breed resentment towards government control.
ReplyDeleteI think that banning these words on a standardized test is really stupid. Children are going to learn and use these words eventually, so why would you screen them out? Yes, there are some words that I don’t think are appropriate for children to know at a young age, but certain words aren’t being screened out because they’re inappropriate, but because they might offend people. Words like religion, Christmas, and birthday! I’m sorry, I don’t want to be insensitive about people’s feelings, but come on, we use these every day and people need to learn to not be so sensitive about everything. And don’t even get me started on dinosaurs!
ReplyDeleteI believe that the amount of banned words is absurd. There are too many. I think they have blown the list of banned words way out of proportion. This seems like an odd thing to be worried about. I don't think that these words would really hinder the test taker's ability to complete the exam.
ReplyDeleteI think that banning these words from tests is a waist of time. Kids hear these words everyday outside of school and will continue to hear them. Taking them off of tests isn't going to solve anything. Besides I've never heard of a kid getting offended by words like dinosaur, or politics. I think that educators should save themselves time and money and shouldn't worry about removing these words from standardized tests.
ReplyDeleteI think that banning words is stupid and a waste of time. People should know better if they are going to use words to put people down or in any other negative way. Many people take words out of context and twist them around, which is happening here. If any of those words were used on a standardized test i am sure there is no insult of any kind behind the use of that word. I have not heard of anyone being offended by the term dinosaur on a test. Besides, its not in tests where words are misused, its in person to person conversation where words can be thrown around and used to hurt someone. That is what they should be focusing on, not banning stupid words that never hurt in the first place.
ReplyDeleteHomes with swimming pools?! What IS this?! This is the most absolutely ridiculous thing I have ever seen. Banning WORDS? I don't even think I can spend a lot of time commenting on this because it's already so frustrating. I understand that people can take words or phrases out of context and become offended by them, but something like this is absurd.
ReplyDeletePeople that get offended by these terms is understandable, but that is what counseling is for. I don't mean to sound harsh, but our government can't protect everyone. The next thing you know, we will ban nationwide every word in English because it might possibly be used offensively. No one would be speaking to each other! I know this scenario is extreme, but if governing bodies want to control the sensitivity and to prevent feelings of sadness or anger, then virtually all words would be banned.
ReplyDeleteThis list is ridiculous. This reminds me of a story I recently read where students in the 2nd grade class of a New Jersey Elementary school are not allowed to have any pent products. A mother of a child in this class was outraged because her son was not allowed to sit with the other kid, so she pushed that no kids in the class could have peanut butter. This is outrageous peanut are in everything and a peanut butter and jelly sandwich was always my favorite and I'm sure many other children's as well, not to mention that it is one of the easiest and cheapest ways to feed children. My heart goes out to the kid but if kids want to sit with him the teacher should check the food before they sit with him, this seems like the reasonable solution but because of a push by a small minority the rules were changed. This brings me back to the banning of these words. If these parents really do not want there kids to learn about these things, there kids should not have to participate in the classes and take something else they find suitable. But the majority of parents that want their children to succeed should let their children learn these words. These words are as much a part of history as any war. I believe you should know as many words as possible and I believe that all these restrictions are hurting the next generation's future.
ReplyDeleteI think the people of New York City have lost their mind. Majority of those words are used daily among people across the United States. Like really "junk food" what is wrong with the word junk food!? There is no doubt in my mind that these words do not affect students when taking a test! What has the world come to?! I mean seriously..
ReplyDeleteThis is a very controversial topic and I think that banning these words is nonsense. By sheltering children to the point of not letting them see certain words is ridiculous. We should let children adhere to these things on their own. Sheltering children and being too overprotective leads children to be rebellious. From experience, I can say that it’s not a good idea to hide things and try to keep kids innocent for as long as possible. Once they realize that they want to do things that their parents don’t want them to do, eventually they’ll not care at all and do whatever they want.
ReplyDeleteNew York City has officially lost it! There is no way that banning these words is healthy in any way at all. It is going to far and not letting children grow and experience things in a normal way.
ReplyDeleteI think they are doing way to much. Sometimes it may be good to ban certain words, because it can remind students of something negative from their past and that can disrupt them when taking the test. But most of the words that New York banned are used in everyday life, and I don't see a problem with them being put on the test
ReplyDeleteI think this is ridiculous. We have the freedom of speech and to leave our the word "dinosaur" because fundamentalist think it is too closely related to evolution is absurd. Who cares what people think of a word and if they are going to fight the city on words like "junk food," "disease," "hunting," "vacations" or "divorce" then the city of New York City has the law to back them up.
ReplyDeleteI believe some of these words could be banned from standardized test, like alcohol or divroce. No kid should be tested on anything relating to those. But words like celebrities and junk food is a little absurd. Kids know what these things are and who cares? Its not like thats going to make an impact on their lives if they see these words on a test. It won't cause some uproar.
ReplyDeleteI don't think NYC has a valid point in banning these words because everyone has the freedom of speech. If they want to say the word, they can say it. Students should be aware of all the negative words, as well as all the positive ones. It is necessary to be a well rounded person. Everyone needs to learn the good and the bad, because the real world is made up of both.
ReplyDeleteNew York and all of these other states banning words from tests is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard of. Our schools need to grow up, and stop spending their time on unimportant things like worrying whether or not the word "Dinosaur" offends some crazy-ass conservative. Children need to know that they are living in a world with alcohol, weapons, and expensive things. School is supposed to educate, not shield out children from real life.
ReplyDeleteHonestly, kids are exposed to these words on a daily basis. It's not going to feed them any ideas when they see it on a test. However, what I wonder is why would these words show up in a standardize test anyway? I don't ever remember dinosaur showing up an any of mine. New York is getting a little paranoid.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe kids are exposed to the words on a daily basis, there is absolutely no reason to ban them. This is America and we all posses the freedom of speech, New York can't ban words just because they are fundamentalist or inappropriate.
ReplyDeleteThis reminds me of when I did my paper on Neon Genesis Evangelion. Hideaki Anno, the director, had programmed the show for young kids (around ages 7-up). With what many fans know about the show's story and layout they became concerned with Anno's decision on making children watch such a graphic and psychologically disturbing show. He simply stated that children should know about the "real world" as soon as possible. In a way this seems to be what New York is trying to avoid. They try to ban such dismal and graphic words to protect the new generation, but the way I see it I believe Anno's methods may be a better solution. When you try to keep your kids from knowing the truth about let's say drugs,and unprotected sex until they are 14 or so, it can be a real problem trying to keep their curiosity from growing into why it's so bad, and they may end up doing it themselves.
ReplyDeletePeople need to first understand the intentions behind a lot of people in politics are for the better. They are not trying to screw the system, they just do so as a repercussion for trying to make it fair for everyone. What they need to do is send out a survey and see if these words really offend their respective World Views. If they do, then perhaps not use them. However, I know many fundamentalists that would not give two shits if they used the word dinosaur. In fact, banning the word from use because fundamentalists could get offended, is almost more offensive in and of itself. As far as making the test more "standardized" I can see where they're coming from on trying to make the test literally, emotionless. If you provoke emotion out of anyone while they are testing, and they incorrectly answer because of it, you are ruining what might otherwise be a decent question. Honestly, I think it's a bit ridiculous, but there's definitely logic behind it.
ReplyDeleteI think it is obvious how ridiculous some politicians can become. I think the problem is that most politicians have lost their connections with the real world. They no longer realize how ridiculous they have gotten. I can see how some words when used in a certain context might bother kids, but other than that, most of them are harmless. As for Florida, I am a Floridian and have dealt with hurricanes all my life, it would have never bothered me to see the word no matter what age I was.
ReplyDeleteI think that banning any words is a bit ridiculous. Whether it’s now or later, kids are going to hear and learn these words. The list with over a dozen words restricts us from our constitutional rights as stated in amendment 1. Banning them from standardized tests makes the stories incredibly boring (even more than they already are), thus maybe even decreasing test scores. I have never heard of any kid getting offensive over the word dinosaur and if they did, they need help. We use these words in our everyday lives and to ban them is absurd.
ReplyDeleteAlthough it is nice they are trying to not offend any test takers, I think most of the words on this list shouldn't have been banned. Some like the sports that requires prior knowledge being banned makes sense because it give other children an edge, but words death and disease or birthdays everyone knows about, and those happen to everyone, even if birthdays aren't celebrated. The people who banned these words had good intentions but went too far, many people probably aren't offended by these topics and would have more to say about these controversial topics than some boring "fair" topic, and still be able to make a good and reasonable argument, with emotion.
ReplyDeleteThe city of NY has no valid basis for banning these words. This is political correctness at it's "finest" once again. It is sad to see our nation conforming into sheltering everyone from the real world. These words are everyday topics of discussion. I think it's time to grow up and deal with it. And no i don't believe that any child would be effected by using these words in a standardized test.
ReplyDeleteI understand where the people that ban these words are coming from, but honestly, I think it's a little too much. These are just words, and cannot do anything to literally harm anyone. It's a good idea if thought about in the early stages, but the banning of these words is a rule that I believe was implemented way too soon, without much thought. I think it's pretty dumb because these words are going to be exposed to kids sooner or later in their life. I don't think it'll affect any child in a standardized test because they are only a couple words out of the vast number of words that exist.
ReplyDeleteI think that there are a few on that list that should be banned, but I don't agree that all of them should be banned. I think that kids knowing what most of those words mean is crucial in society today.
ReplyDeleteI can understand a state wanting some workds to be banned that could be offensive to some poeople. But New York banning that many words is simply ridiculous. I mean, not like any of us really pay attention to what we read on standardized tests, but still. I dont think that banning the words will alter anyones education though. We hear most of those words on a regular basis and learn about them in school so that wont really do any hard to us. What it really does is make the job of whoever writes the standardized tests harder. Try not using a common word for a day. It is pretty hard.
ReplyDeleteThis is completely ridiculous, to say the least. Censorship is getting way out of hand because people do not realize that everything is offensive to someone. Does that mean that everything we say or do should also be stopped? Now, some topics such as abuse and pornography should not be on a test, yes, but there is nothing wrong with birthdays and the sort. Since I am not a Jehovah's Witness, isn't it valid for me to be offended at the reasoning behind the banning of "birthday?" Oh, and to answer your second question, this banning will cause an obstruction. Tests such as these are meant to test your standing in certain subjects. How can that be done if everything that could possibility be tested on is offensive?
ReplyDeleteThese seems a bit ridiculous. I can understand the removal of certain words that people might find offensive, but alot of the words on the list are completely harmless. In my opinion most of the politically correct nonsense is pointless. There is always one person that is offended by something regardless of what it may be. I believe that as a country we need to look past the way that something is worded and see it for its true value.
ReplyDeleteI believe that in time students should be introduced to these words. In our society today most kids are being exposed to this type of stuff everyday! Especially in New York of all places. I think it is best to introduce these words now, rather than later. It is not like putting one of these words on a test will 'corrupt' a student.
ReplyDeleteI understand what is trying to be done by banning these words off the test. And yes New York City has every right to do that. But simply taking some words off of a standardized test that really aren't that offensive isn't going to do anything. I'm sure you could hear worse things said while walking the streets of NYC. I also think that test is going to be so much more boring for students causing more students to fail it
ReplyDeleteThe intention is good, but the action is not necessarily good. I don't 'protecting' kids from these words is really beneficial, since sooner or later most children will hear these words at one point.
ReplyDelete